imi message

Subject: RE: [imi] Issue 25: ic09:X509Principal and ic09:X509SubjectAndIssuer introduced in locations that violate IMI 1.0 schema

From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "'Mike Jones'" <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, <imi@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:51:50 -0500

> Proposed Resolution:  Place the ic09:X509Principal and
> ic09:X509SubjectAndIssuer elements within a ds:X509Data element (which
does
> allow extensions), with the ds:X509Data element being within an
> ic:X509V3Credential element.

What's the rationale for not using the existing ds:X509SubjectName and
ds:X509IssuerSerial elements?

-- Scott

References:
- Issue 25: ic09:X509Principal and ic09:X509SubjectAndIssuerintroduced in locations that violate IMI 1.0 schema
  - From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>