[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (IMI-27) Need for more specificityin issuer language for SAML 2.0 token profile
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16822#action_16822 ] Scott Cantor commented on IMI-27: --------------------------------- Proposal accepted in WD-04. > Need for more specificity in issuer language for SAML 2.0 token profile > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IMI-27 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-27 > Project: OASIS Identity Metasystem Interoperability (IMI) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Michael Jones > Priority: Minor > > The section on relying parties identifying token issuers currently says: > When identifying a requirement for a specific token issuer, the relying party SHOULD use the identity provider's unique name (i.e., its "entityID"). > This doesn't specify which protocol elements are being referred to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]