RE: [imi] IMI TC Minutes, Dec 17th

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

Marc Goodner wrote on 2009-12-17:
> SAML 2.0 token profile
> 
> ...
> 
> Editorial issues remain with draft, assigned to editors to resolve

Could somebody speak to this? Is there something else I need to modify, or
is this a note that there is additional feedback known but not yet supplied?

> Proposed resolutions for issues 29 - 32 above accepted for inclusion in
new
> IMI 1.1 draft and assigned to editors

With regard to the additional object tag extensions, I would like to note
for the record that I am against expansion of what I believe is too limited
a model for requirements expression. We should move this out to a structured
format that's more extensible, whether it's XRD or something else.

-- Scott