[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [imi] work product review
Hi Mary, I believe that the attached versions address all identified
issues in both drafts. Thanks for your careful read of both documents! --
Mike From: Mary McRae
[mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] The following issues have been identified in the submitted
work products and must be corrected before they can be uploaded to docs.oasis-open.org and a public review
announced: SAML V2.0 Information Card Token Profile Version 1.0 1. Specification URIs: This Version: The path includes 'ed'; I'm guessing this is
intended to point to something akin to a Working Draft. Note that the TC
Process clearly identifies the stages of a document as follows: working draft
(wd), committee draft (cd), public review draft (pr), committee specification
(cs), and OASIS standard (os). There is no such stage as 'ed'. Previous Version: As this is the first time this document has been
requested to be uploaded, it should state 'N/A'. the URIs specified in this
section do not resolve (and won't, since we only upload approved documents to docs.oasis-open.org) 2. Namespaces: This section has been removed from the cover page, but the
following reference is given in 2.1: Note that ns is reserved for OASIS namespaces, all of which
must be identified on the cover page of a document and accompanied by a
namespace document that corresponds to the template found at docs.oasis-open.org/templates 3. References: WSTrust14 reference does not meet the OASIS citation link
requirements SAML1.1IMI reference does not conform to the OASIS citation
format/link requirements. ------ SAML V1.1 Information Card Token Profile Version 1.0 1. Specification URIs: This Version: The path includes 'ed'; I'm guessing this is
intended to point to something akin to a Working Draft. Note that the TC
Process clearly identifies the stages of a document as follows: working draft
(wd), committee draft (cd), public review draft (pr), committee specification
(cs), and OASIS standard (os). There is no such stage as 'ed'. Previous Version: As this is the first time this document has been
requested to be uploaded, it should state 'N/A'. the URIs specified in this
section do not resolve (and won't, since we only upload approved documents to docs.oasis-open.org) 2. Namespaces: This section has been removed from the cover page, but the
following reference is given in 2.1: Note that ns is reserved for OASIS namespaces, all of which
must be identified on the cover page of a document and accompanied by a
namespace document that corresponds to the template found at docs.oasis-open.org/templates 3. References The references to OASIS TC documents do not conform to the
OASIS citation format/link requirements. 4. Invalid URI: In section 2.4.1 the following URI is given: That is an invalid reference. Please make the necessary corrections, re-approve the
documents, and re-submit for public review. Regards, Mary Mary P McRae Director, Standards Development Technical Committee Administrator OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen phone: 1.603.232.9090 Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open. |
imi_saml_profiles_cds_for_public_review-02.zip
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]