[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [kmip] Length of meetings
Hi Folks, I think scheduling 2 hours is also a good idea. As the group gets larger, it becomes necessary to extend the meeting length just because the procedural portions (taking attendance, roll call votes, etc) also get longer. Plus the work load usually increases. I'm unhappy that we only got through one item today, and doubly so that it was partly my fault. The group is still pretty new, and I think we're still trying to find the efficiency point. Early in the alignment discussion, someone suggested that we immediately start an electronic ballot and get the issue over with. In retrospect, that would have been more expedient, although I think we had some useful dialog on the pros/cons of 32-bit vs 64-bit. I dislike meetings that go down a rat hole as much as the rest of you, and hope that we can learn (possibly through some trial-and-error) the processes that keep the meetings efficient. Here are some of my thoughts on how we can keep the meetings lean-and-mean:
Cheers, -Matt Marcus Streets wrote: I believe it is clear that we do not achieve sufficient progress in a --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php |
begin:vcard fn:Matt Ball n:Ball;Matthew org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Key Management adr:;;500 El Dorado Blvd, Bldg 5;Broomfield;CO;80021;U.S.A. email;internet:matthew.ball@sun.com title:Staff Engineer tel;work:303-272-7580 tel;fax:303-272-3023 tel;cell:303-717-2717 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.sun.com version:2.1 end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]