kmip message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Fw: [kmip] Profiles doc missing update from F2F
- From: Bruce Rich <brich@us.ibm.com>
- To: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:14:09 -0600
I believe this issue is still outstanding.
Bruce A Rich
brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
----- Forwarded by Bruce
Rich/Austin/IBM on 12/01/2009 10:12 PM -----
From:
| Bruce Rich/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
|
To:
| kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Date:
| 11/11/2009 12:09 PM
|
Subject:
| [kmip] Profiles doc |
In looking over the public review draft of the Profiles doc, I see that
Transparent Key Struct is still listed as REQUIRED, despite this approved
motion during the F2F
Motion to remove 13.1.1.e (Transparent Key Struct) from the base profile
requirement (Ref to 2.1.7). Moved by Indra, seconded by Bruce. The
server does not
have to support such transparent key formats, as raw format is sufficient
as a base.
No abstention/objection. Motion passes.
(See day 1 minutes at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/kmip/download.php/34581/KMI_%20f2f_Sep_28_2009.pdf)
So unless there was a later change, I think we should remove such support,
perhaps in a final update at the end of public review.
Bruce A Rich
brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]