RE: [kmip] Issue with KMIP SoUs/conformance vs. Use Cases

[<shyam.mankala@rsa.com>]

Usecase 3.1.5 gives the instance of Opaque (Key Format Type).

Thanks
-- Shyam

-----Original Message-----
From: Wierenga, Steven [mailto:steve.wierenga@hp.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 12:24 PM
To: Griffin, Robert; kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [kmip] Issue with KMIP SoUs/conformance vs. Use Cases

Hello Bob and all,

While doing due diligence preparing the HP Statement of Use, I noticed
some discrepancies between the Profiles document and the Use Cases which
make it problematic to claim or corroborate conformance and interop
based on the Use Cases:

1. The Secret Data Profile requires - Enumerated Objects - Key Format
Type - Opaque.  However there is no instance of Opaque in the Use Cases
document.

2. The Basic Symmetric Key Store and Server Profile requires -
Enumerated Objects - Key Format Type - Transparent Symmetric Key.
However there is no instance of Transparent Symmetric Key in the Use
Cases document. 

3.  Likewise, the Basic Symmetric Key Foundry and Server Profile
requires - Enumerated Objects - Key Format Type - Transparent Symmetric
Key.  Again, there is no instance of Transparent Symmetric Key in the
Use Cases document. 

This is not just an editorial issue, if conformance/interop have not
been fully verified or are not verifiable under the current Use Cases.
Either the Profiles or the Use Cases need to be amended to match.

Thanks,
--Steve Wierenga
HP

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php