FW: Co-editorship of KMIP Use Cases document

fyi - here's the note from Mary.

regards,

Bob

From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 11:52 AM
To: Griffin, Robert
Cc: MBJ@zurich.ibm.com; Subhash.Sankuratripati@netapp.com; rha@zurich.ibm.com; tjh@cryptsoft.com
Subject: Re: Co-editorship of KMIP Use Cases document

Hi Bob,

It's up to the TC - some appoint editors, some vote for them. I think a simple "is there anyone who would like to volunteer as spec editor?" and "is there any objection to [name(s)] becoming an editor(s) for the [spectitle] specification?" would work just fine. There's no limit as to the number of editors allowed so whatever the TC feels is appropriate works.

Mary

On Oct 5, 2010, at 11:29 AM, <robert.griffin@rsa.com> <robert.griffin@rsa.com> wrote:

Hi Mathias -

I think we voted on editors, as well as co-chairs, at the kmip meeting in april 2009. So I think we need to vote on Tim as new co-editorm

Mary, is that correct? Or is no vote needed?

Regards

Bob

From: Mathias Bjoerkqvist1 <MBJ@zurich.ibm.com>
To: Griffin, Robert; Subhash.Sankuratripati@netapp.com <Subhash.Sankuratripati@netapp.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>; Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>
Sent: Tue Oct 05 07:30:25 2010
Subject: Co-editorship of KMIP Use Cases document

Hi Bob, Subhash,

Since Rene will not contribute as co-editor of the KMIP Use Cases document anymore, we thought it would make sense to look for another co-editor.
I checked with Tim informally and he would be willing to volunteer. I suppose there is some kind of process we need to follow to elect a new co-editor, and we should also give a chance to other people to express their interest in the co-editorship.
If there are many steps involved, it would be good to get the ball rolling as soon as possible. Would it make sense to include an agenda item for this for this week's TC call?

Regards,
Mathias

kmip message