Re: [kmip] Cryptographic Services Proposal - Next Steps

[Kelley Burgin <kwburgi@tycho.ncsc.mil>]

I apologize for my misunderstanding that fueled this fire. I forgot  
that "get random" is the name of a specific proposal. Tim is right: I  
am interested in getting some form of get-random into KMIP 1.2.

Kelley

On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Tim Hudson wrote:

> > You clearly do not understand my "get random" proposal
>
> John, what I said and I quote "Your requirements are already met  
> with the proposal I put out there."
> That is a true statement and not something which you have challenged.
>
> That your proposal has a pile of other capability which you consider  
> critically important for your particular use case is entirely  
> irrelevant if others do not see those same requirements in their  
> areas of interest.
>
> Kelley has sent a follow up email making his views on the proposals  
> clear given that the emails on the list were somewhat confusing.  
> Kelley (I believe) was simply making sure that some form of get- 
> random makes it into KMIP 1.2 which is covered in the proposal put  
> forward.
>
> I suggest you keep your unfounded personal accusations and comments  
> off the list. They are simply non-productive.
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: kmip-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: kmip-help@lists.oasis-open.org