[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [kmip] Groups - Attestation_Proposal_v0.5.docx uploaded
Hi Kiran, I don't have a problem with adding support for Geotags, but the NIST doc you refer to is a proof of concept draft (something I'm actually not familiar with at NIST). The TCG, TPM and SAML attestation types have standards that describe how to construct the particular object, and the objects contain identifying information to distinguish between versions. Is there something similar for Geotags? Kelley On Apr 22, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Kiran Kumar Thota wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]