[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [kmip] Groups - KMIP Error Handling clarification investigation uploaded
On 26/06/2015 3:05 AM, Bruce Rich wrote: > /Submitter's message/ > Preliminary discussions on the topic of KMIP Error Handling > clarification caused a recursion...we may need clarification of our > charter, as we are leaning more toward defining a testable profile > than a wordsmithing exercise, but that is not what we believe we were > asked to do. For reference following the TC call discussion today the following are the set of Result Reason enumeration values actually used across the test cases in the Test Cases document and the test cases contained within the various Profiles documents. There are a total of 70 occurrences of Result Reasons. 4 x CryptographicFailure 3 x FeatureNotSupported 5 x InvalidMessage 8 x ItemNotFound 3 x ObjectArchived 35 x PermissionDenied 12 x ResponseTooLarge There are a total of 22 defined Result Reason enumeration values in KMIP 1.2 which means the test cases combined hit around 30% of the enumeration range. Across all of section 11 Error Handling there are 171 error descriptions. The main discussions in the face to face as I recollect it were about actually looking through the error codes and reviewing them to see if they make sense in the light of more implementation experience and interoperability testing within the TC itself since the reason codes were put in place over five years ago. Tim.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]