[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [kmip] Groups - Client / Server Correlation Value uploaded
I did not consider that a client might be incapable of generating a unique identifier (and if you reiterated that point on the call, I apologize for not hearing/understanding it). Interesting from that perspective, but perhaps also unlikely? And a client of such limited capability might not be able to log the server’s response, anyway?
From: Anthony Berglas [mailto:email@example.com]
Hello John and David,
(Sorry for the late response)
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Featherstone, David <David.Featherstone@safenet-inc.com> wrote:
I do not agree that the semantics of the Unique Batch Item ID could not / should not be changed to support enhanced logging. That said, I do agree with John Leiseboer that there is no need for a Response Correlation.
The changes are an improvement. I don’t see a need for the ResponseCorrelation value though. If the RequestCorrelation value is present in the Request message and the related Response message, that should be sufficient to correlate the request with the response in both client and server logs. What need do you see for having both correlation values in the Response message? If the one correlation value is sufficient, then maybe it could be renamed MessageCorrelation value or something similar?
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.