[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Question for today's agenda: ID Placeholder
Hi Tony Would you please add the following question regarding ID Placeholder to today’s agenda. Cheers, … Dave Initial conditions:
Batch request: · Batch Order Option = true
It seems strange, and hazardous, that the Locate operation’s setting of the ID Placeholder can leapfrog the Revoke operation’s explicit setting of the UniqueIdentifier to have effect on the operation following Revoke. A reasonable expectation for the above scenario would be that the Revoke operation sets the ID Placeholder to its explicitly set UniqueIdentifier (thereby resulting in the Destroy of bar instead of foo). QUESTION: Why does the KMIP specification deny setting of the ID Placeholder to operations like Revoke, Check, Get, and others that operate on a single, possibly explicit UniqueIdentifier? BTW – As pointed out by Judy Furlong, the KMIP specification seems to have neglected ID Placeholder w.r.t. some of the newer operations [e.g. Split Key]. Cheers, … Dave The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]