On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Subhrojoy Roy <subhroro@in.ibm.com> wrote:
Folks,
A Gentle reminder !
I understand the TC was going to be updated. Please let us know when shall it be reflected. Also, we observed the same issue with 3rd and 4th timelines in TC-PKCS12-1-XX. Please update us on this as well.
Warm Regards,
Subhrojoy Roy
Software Developer, IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager
Mobile: +91 9477 539 571 | Phone: 020-420-25745
E-mail: subhroro@in.ibm.com
Chat:Subhrojoy Roy
Pune, MH 411057
India
----- Forwarded by Subhrojoy Roy/India/IBM on 08-03-18 03:42 PM -----
From: Subhrojoy Roy/India/IBM
To: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Prashant V Mestri/India/IBM@IBMIN
Date: 01-03-18 11:52 AM
Subject: Query on TC-CERTATTR-1-14
Hello Folks,
We see there's this test case TC-CERTATTR-1-14 that registers a certificate of type X509 (without specifying the Usage Mask in the request). While it reaches KMIP server, it should ideally be failing the registration operation as it expects a Usage Mask to be supplied in the request (Reference: Table No. 171 in KMIP v1.4 specification document). Is there an issue in the test case itself as Usage Mask is a mandatory parameter to be passed in the request while registering a certificate or is there any default Usage Mask to be assumed in case it's not passed in the request ?
Warm Regards,
Subhrojoy Roy
Software Developer, IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager
Mobile: +91 9477 539 571 | Phone: 020-420-25745
E-mail: subhroro@in.ibm.com
Chat:
Pune, MH 411057
India
