kmip message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Certificates and Cryptographic Usage Mask attribute
- From: Mark Joseph <mark@p6r.com>
- To: "kmip@lists.oasis-open.org" <kmip@lists.oasis-open.org>, Tony Cox <tony.cox@cryptsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:08:55 -0700
Hi all,
I am not the first to ask why does KMIP require a Cryptographic Usage Mask for a Certificate? And exactly which value for the Mask makes sense?
It has caused some problems during the interop and I can just see our customers having trouble with this.
How about we discuss this in the Face to Face next week? Maybe we can agree that Certificates don't need Cryptographic Usage Masks for KMIP 2.0, which is what I would like to propose.
Best,
Mark
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]