[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [kmip] Certificates and Cryptographic Usage Mask attribute
Guys in KMIP spec it is clearly written that Usage Mask defines the usage of a Key (No Certificates and Secret data)
Thanks,
Nitin
From: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:kmip@lists.oasis-open.
org ] On Behalf Of Furlong, Judith
Sent: 04 April 2018 03:16
To: Chevalier, Tim <Tim.Chevalier@netapp.com>; Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>; Mark Joseph <mark@p6r.com>
Cc: OASIS KMIP Technical Committee <kmip@lists.oasis-open.org>; Tony Cox <tony.cox@cryptsoft.com>
Subject: [+SPAM+]: RE: [kmip] Certificates and Cryptographic Usage Mask attribute
Judy
Judith Furlong
Sr. Consultant Product Security Architect
Dell EMC | Product Security Office
Office: +1-508-249-1124
From: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:kmip@lists.oasis-open.
org ] On Behalf Of Chevalier, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 5:40 PM
To: Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>; Mark Joseph <mark@p6r.com>
Cc: OASIS KMIP Technical Committee <kmip@lists.oasis-open.org>; Tony Cox <tony.cox@cryptsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [kmip] Certificates and Cryptographic Usage Mask attribute
Hi,
Along those lines I’ve never understood the requirement for a cryptographic mask for the Secret Data object…
--Tim
From: <kmip@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 4:16 PM
To: Mark Joseph <mark@p6r.com>
Cc: OASIS KMIP Technical Committee <kmip@lists.oasis-open.org>, Tony Cox <tony.cox@cryptsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [kmip] Certificates and Cryptographic Usage Mask attribute
The masks themselves also need to be more clearly defined in terms of their intended impact on KMIP servers and clients in terms of both KMIP operations and underlying cryptographic usage.
Tim.
On Tue, 3 Apr. 2018, 1:09 pm Mark Joseph, <mark@p6r.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I am not the first to ask why does KMIP require a Cryptographic Usage Mask for a Certificate? And exactly which value for the Mask makes sense?
It has caused some problems during the interop and I can just see our customers having trouble with this.
How about we discuss this in the Face to Face next week? Maybe we can agree that Certificates don't need Cryptographic Usage Masks for KMIP 2.0, which is what I would like to propose.
Best,
Mark
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]