Re: Test case PKCS11-M-1-20, Operation type="Enumeration" value="PKCS#11"

[Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>]

You are correct - I missed that conversion in writing the test case.Â

I've made that update.

Thanks,

Tim.

On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:49 AM Mark Joseph <mark@p6r.com> wrote:

The value for Operation, shouldn't it be "PKCS_11" ?  Don't the rules for normalizing names remove # signs?

<RequestMessage>

 <RequestHeader>

  <ProtocolVersion>

   <ProtocolVersionMajor type="Integer" value="2"/>

   <ProtocolVersionMinor type="Integer" value="0"/>

  </ProtocolVersion>

  <ClientCorrelationValue type="TextString" value="PKCS11-M-1-20 step=0"/>

  <BatchCount type="Integer" value="1"/>

 </RequestHeader>

 <BatchItem>

  <Operation type="Enumeration" value="PKCS#11"/>

  <RequestPayload>

   <PKCS_11Function type="Enumeration" value="C_Initialize"/>

   <PKCS_11InputParameters type="ByteString" value="01"/>

  </RequestPayload>

 </BatchItem>

</RequestMessage>

Best,

Mark Joseph

P6R Inc

408-205-0361