[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalcite-markup-discuss] Draft of a charter for the Legal Citation (LegalCite) Technical Committee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chet, I assume that all of the "highly visible" similar projects have advocates if not adherents. To the extent there are bodies of legal materials using other markup models, a mapping between existing markup models and the TC's model could ease the acceptance of the latter in the marketplace. Thinking with a mapping that metadata for the Legalcite TCs markup could inure to the benefit of citatons held in other systems. Any thoughts about such mappings or at least a mechanism to support such mappings being among the TC's deliverables? Hope you are having a great day! Patrick On 10/29/2013 02:14 PM, Chet Ensign wrote: > All, > > I have been working on the draft for a charter for the proposed > Legalcite Technical Committee. The draft below incorporates > feedback from several people, especially changes to make clear that > the scope is the markup model (conceptual model, vocabulary, > metadata definitions and syntatical structure) not print format > recommendations and changes to get rid of any perceived US-centric > bias. > > Please have a look and let us know what you think. We are getting > close to the point where the charter can be formally submitted to > OASIS and the TC started up. I anticipate - given the timeline of > events necessary to start a Technical Committee and the impending > holidays - that a first meeting would be set for sometime in > January of 2014. > > --- Charter draft --- > > Section 1: Charter > > (1)(a) TC Name > > OASIS Legal Citation (Legalcite) TC > > (1)(b) Statement of Purpose > > One of the fundamental principles of legal writing is that every > statement of law or fact must carry a citation to its source. > Citations document the history of precedent that ensures the > continuity and consistent interpretation and application of the > law. Legal documents almost always include citations within the > body of the text and, in fact, would be unacceptable without them. > > The specifications for constructing citations that exist today vary > across jurisdictions and languages. Work has been done on several > initiatives to develop markup standards for citations (see list at > http://tinyurl.com/legalCite-DataModel) yet the focus of many > efforts and much of the analysis has been on the form of the > citation on the page itself. In today’s world of electronic > publishing, online research and proliferating sources of material, > the lack of a rich markup language vocabulary and syntax presents a > number of problems, key among them: > > 1) Print citations can't be machine-processed with 100% > reliability, e.g. a citation may point to a page with complex text > that requires a human reader to decipher the intended target. A > markup standard could enable precise processing. > > 2) There is no way to encode improvements in quality and accuracy > into a citation over time so publishers and other users must > reprocess the text citations over and over. With a markup standard, > a publisher could enrich a citation with metadata that would > persist, enabling many downstream applications to work on the data > instead of re-fixing it. > > 3) There is no way to encode consistent metadata behind print > citations that may vary from one jurisdiction to the next. A markup > standard would allow normalization and enhancement to be done in > the tagging, leaving the print citation untouched. > > 4) There is no way to enrich the citation with additional metadata > that can assist authors, editors, or readers in using the citation. > A markup standard could allow information to be captured beyond > what was needed for linking. > > 5) There is no support for extracting citations into databases or > even something as simple as tables of authority. Standard markup in > documents would allow citations to be harvested simply by > processing the embedded tagging in the document. > > A non-proprietary, royalty-free, open citation markup standard > designed with the input of subject matter experts and focused on > the requirements of a broad cross-section of the legal community > can provide the foundation for creating enriched content that can > be useful across multiple groups of interested parties. It can > provide a basis for creating more powerful editorial and data > handling tools for legal content. It can support the development of > federated citation databases that help connect legal professionals > to resources and ensure the persistence of cross-references over > time. It can support the growth of open source legal content and > applications. And it can become a foundation for new products and > services of value to everyone in the legal community. > > Just as web browsers and related types of software have become core > parts of our interactive computer environment thanks to the > foundation of HTML, a legal citation markup standard can enable a > new generation of tools and capabilities benefiting all players and > allowing commercial entities to deliver new generations of products > and services limited only by their imagination and ability to > innovate. > > Around the world, the number of officially binding electronic > resources for legislation, case law and official documents is > increasing. Relying solely on the printed text of citations will > add to the cost and burden of researching and complying with > increasingly complex legal issues. A uniform approach to legal > citations is crucial for the long-term accessibility and > preservation of legal content. > > (1)(c) Scope > > The Legalcite TC will develop an open standard for machine-readable > tagging of legal citations. Specifically, the standard will provide > a conceptual model, vocabulary, metadata definitions and syntatical > structure that: > > - Enables cites to be richly tagged while leaving the visible text > of the citation undisturbed. > > - Works for a broad variety of legal content types including court > cases, legislation, regulations, parliamentary documents and legal > treatises. > > - Supports citations as used in different countries and > jurisdictions. > > - Allows other metadata to be associated with citations for > purposes beyond just linking. > > The TC will also define use cases, overviews, sample data sets and > such other non-normative content as can help guide implementers and > users to develop and adopt of the standard. > > Out of scope: > > The TC will not specify how citations should be processed nor > define specific tools for citations. For example, it will provide > semantics for describing the information needed to link citations, > but it will not specify how such linking should be implemented in > systems. > > The TC will not specify nor make assumptions about how and where in > the lifecycle of legal materials the citation markup would be added > to content. In particular, it will not specify or assume that > citation markup is added during original content creation. > > The TC will not specify prescriptions for citation repositories or > for other types of implementations that could be built on the > foundation of the standard. > > (1)(d) Deliverables > > The TC will produce: > > 1. An open legal citation markup standard within 12 to 18 months of > the first meeting. > > 2. A list of business cases and use cases to be supported by the > standard within 12 to 18 months of the first meeting. The list may > include use cases regarding the treatment of legacy materials. > > 3. Optionally, such other explanatory, educational or supporting > material as the TC may choose to produce to support the overall > standard, timing to be determined as the TC progresses. > > (1)(e) IPR Mode > > The TC will operate under the Non Assertion IPR mode as defined in > the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy effective 15 > October 2010. > > (1)(f) Audience > > Because citations are fundamental to the practice and application > of the law, the audience for this work is extensive: > > - Developers creating products for the legal market, including the > open source and open government communities. > > - Legal publishers and service providers > > - Law librarians > > - Academics, especially those with an interest in legal analytics > > - Court, legislative and administrative staffs, especially those > charged with performing research and drafting documents as well as > government IT staff who must support them > > (1)(g) Language > > The TC shall carry out its activities in English. > > Section 2: Additional Information > > (2)(a) Identification of Similar Work > > A substantial amount of work has been done on legal citations. The > following lists some of the more highly visible initiatives. > > - The OASIS LegalDocumentML TC is based on the Akoma Ntoso ( > http://www.akomantoso.org/) specification produced under the > UN/DESA’s Africa i-Parliament Action Plan. The specification > includes a URI-based syntax for legal citations and a naming > convention. ( > http://www.akomantoso.org/release-notes/akoma-ntoso-2.0-schema/naming-conventions-1) > > - The IETF has published an Internet Draft titled “A Uniform > Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Sources of Law (LEX).” The > document provides a URN convention for “identifying, naming, > assigning, and managing persistent resources in the legal domain.” > ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spinosa-urn-lex/) > > - The Council of Ministers of the European Union have published > ‘Conclusions’ regarding a proposed European Case Law Identifier or > ECLI (see http://tinyurl.com/ln3tx3l ) and a European Legislation > Identifier or ELI (see http://tinyurl.com/cpv6hg4 )to support the > development of a semantic web of official gazettes. ( > http://legalinformatics.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/st17554-en11.pdf) > > - The CEN Workshop on Open XML interchange format for legal > documents has developed CEN MetaLex, a standard for the way sources > of law and references to sources of law are to be represented in > XML. (http://www.metalex.eu/ ). > > - The UK National Archives uses Crown Legislation Markup Language > (CLML) to make data available over Legislation.gov.uk. ( > https://github.com/lewismc/clml-schemas/blob/master/CLML%20Schemas/README.txt) > > - Juriconnect, is a consortium of government bodies, legal > publishers and academia in the Netherlands produced Juriconnect > Standard BWB (Basis Wetten Bestand) is the basis for referring to > parts of regulations. ( > http://www.juriconnect.nl/downloadreg.asp?bestand=Juriconnect%5FStandaard%5FBWB%5F1%5F3%2Epdf&type=pdf) > > - “PRESTO: A WWW Information Architecture for Legislation and > Public Information Systems” by Rick Jelliffe describes a > methodology that governments could use to provide access to > documents at any level of granularity, in particular legislation > and regulations. ( > http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletter/news2008-02-26.html#cite7 ) > > In addition, much work has been done on standards for structuring > and representing citations and much has been written on the > problems of legal citation and how to address them. An extensive > list of these resources can be found at > http://tinyurl.com/legalCite-DataModel. > > (2)(b) First TC Meeting > > First meeting date TBD – > > (2)(c) Ongoing Meeting Schedule > > (2)(d) TC Proposers > > Richard Beatch (rbeatch@bloomberg.net), Bloomberg LP James Cabral > (jcabral@mtgmc.com ), MTG Management Consultants, LLC Ken Hirsh > (ken.hirsh@uc.edu ), American Association of Law Libraries John > Joergensen (jjoerg@andromeda.rutgers.edu ) Rutgers School of Law > Laurel Shifrin (laurel.shifrin@lexisnexis.com), LexisNexis Monica > Palmirani (monica.palmirani@unibo.it), University of > Bologna-CIRSFID > > (2)(e) Primary Representatives' Support > > > (2)(f) TC Convener > > The TC will be convened by John Joergensen of the Rutgers School of > Law – Newark. > > (2)(g) OASIS Member Section > > The TC intends to request affiliation with the OASIS LegalXML > Member Section. > > - -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) Former Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJScBaPAAoJEAudyeI2QFGoEXgQAIZIE7NO6uDq6zX8i8cEoLca 8G+BM+lU3vbAFBPWDyV7Vx9R4tpsZ+EHPNI5D+vFAf4VIbvV0rrWCtlhPFicIjkw jZEk2p1WHVmkgFREAoNfWE+e9JYBSOGGcHYSfVDHEjVm/X5LF0anynTt6ssEFm6+ mftnkzzgT4AWqpdLL5fymKO8a/HDzRw8BXG7WSyFjnakKrmtK9HVVbGEern4jW2d +zT/N3jPbN5r0sZWbGG9N+/AYM/rDf7mbiUk2DWet8F5I26+dzAmzqgAqcH7XS68 RpHh8Z8i4KxtjfIzY/cLQPQHXP46FTLuBmVCvxmwF52qZwRYfSXlvGXsjbj+ttfi d4pEbqXf9alyGLCQpNaUhmJaA3yRk4tL5B0nw+NkCvutfF5bC2na+MzkPLXjQE7c atLqF5mqExhj+O957EAIa2LQCS9jS7bgJBHNGHV2DXX7Q5DGak+EQm8CZ2CJrDeO ytVCNRqW7IVn3YsCSoSzH+ITSBkLCtJ3VEfFUV0WEJhyC6r1yJhA20x9odXC+LBn zwTU5gser1aTZuEpuWXBlTMZk8jYq7W8VZYRR+stTzdbNCJzubavq6ijzOzGPAJU IXgGLFpC9q8fb5sQLR/xAbVfHLkdhgqpCEGdvAliKGyAlBAjOCQCx6dSQEVuBP/t 7B+IMKrPR4Zcw8rwEw24 =kMPc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]