[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Italian Constitution
The Italian Constitution is really recent. It was delivered on 27 December 1947. It was published in the Official Gazette GU n.298, 27-12-1947. It entered in force at 1/1/1948. http://www.quirinale.it/qrnw/statico/costituzione/costituzione.htm (original publication 1947) During the life of the Italian Constitution we had 18 acts of modifications (from 1958 to 2012). http://www.normattiva.it/do/atto/vediAggiornamentiAllAtto;jsessionid=ZrCkEVJSnzEL7lkhmXrudA__.sgc2-prd-guri?atto.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=1947-12-27&atto.codiceRedazionale=047U0001¤tSearch=ricerca_avanzata_aggiornamenti There isn't an official version legal bining consolidated, only an "informative" source in the following authorial web sites: http://www.quirinale.it/qrnw/statico/costituzione/pdf/costituzione.pdf (consolidated with the modifications) http://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:costituzione One of the important modification is an "errata corrige" published in Official Gazzett, GU n.2 del 3-1-1948. The "Errata Corrige" in Italy has retroactive effect, so this modification is considered existing since the beginning, since when the constitution was born on 27-12-1947. http://www.normattiva.it/atto/caricaDettaglioAtto?atto.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=1948-01-03&atto.codiceRedazionale=048A0001&atto.articolo.numero=1&atto.articolo.tipoArticolo=0 The modification is in the art. 107, line 3rd. Here the original text in Italian: "Nella Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana, pubblicata nella edizione straordinaria della Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 298 di sabato 27 dicembre 1947, all'art. 107, linea 3a, ove per errore tipografico e' detto: "... sedi o funzionari ...", ecc..., si deve leggere: "... sedi o funzioni ...", This use case arises two problems: a) the IRI of the resource of the constitution after the errata corrige. How we should "call" this new version of the constitution? In URN:LEX we have a particular specification for that. So we have:
The difference between the two annotation is fundamental: in URN:LEX usually we put the date of publication of the errata corrige. In Akoma Ntoso we include the date of efficacy of the modification, the date when the new version starts, even if it is retroactive. b) there is another problem with the citation "all'art. 107, linea 3a" in English "in the art. 197, 3rd line". This citation is a positional citation, not a logic/normative citation, following the paper hard copy metaphor. This is quite frequent in the "errata corrige", nowadays, considering that this errors are classified, legally speaking, typos. -- =================================== Associate professor of Legal Informatics School of Law Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna C.I.R.S.F.I.D. http://www.cirsfid.unibo.it/ Palazzo Dal Monte Gaudenzi - Via Galliera, 3 I - 40121 BOLOGNA (ITALY) Tel +39 051 277217 Fax +39 051 260782 E-mail monica.palmirani@unibo.it ==================================== |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]