[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalcitem] Prolegomena to the constitution of subcommittees
Hi All, I like Fabio's general guide on subcommittees. I envision subcommittees form because we need to divide the work in order to complete it expeditiously. Our first round of subcommittee work should be DRAFT. Then all subcommittees can compare their work and the whole Committee can adopt the best ideas from the bunch. Then, subcommittees can re-convene to revise first round DRAFTS based on the best ideas agreed upon by the Committee. Moreover, I think each subcommittee should include techies and non-techies (end users). If we want to self-identify in advance of the next meeting for (a) techie/non-techie and (b) preferred subcommittee/document type, I can prepare a list so that we can dole out responsibility appropriately and quickly at the next meeting. Melanie Knapp George Mason University Law Library Arlington, VA On 2/18/2014 5:57 PM, Chet Ensign
wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]