Re: [legalruleml] Interpretation in LegalRuleML

[monica.palmirani <monica.palmirani@unibo.it>]

Hi Adam,

we have discussed in the last TC the priorities for arriving to the 
Public Review deadline for the end of the year.
We can put this topic for the next year.
We have to finish the defeasibilty example, the schema discussion, the 
temporal issues.

Yours,
Monica
Il 13/11/2012 18:07, Dr. Adam Wyner ha scritto:
> After discussion some time ago about interpretation, I did some reading/thinking about the topic.  It seems to me that some indication of interpretive heuristic might be essential for legalruleML since such heuristics play an important role in understanding what any piece of law means relative to context.  An interesting resource in this regard is:
>
> Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
> Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. Garner
> 2012
>
> This catalogs the various interpretive tools.  They argue for textual basis for interpretation, but that is not the key use of the book for our purposes.  Will be interesting to see if this will fit into legalruleML or not.
>
> Perhaps this is a topic for discussion in the TC tomorrow.
>
> Cheers,
> Adam


--
===================================
Associate professor of Legal Informatics
School of Law
Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna
C.I.R.S.F.I.D. http://www.cirsfid.unibo.it/
Palazzo Dal Monte Gaudenzi - Via Galliera, 3
I - 40121 BOLOGNA (ITALY)
Tel +39 051 277217
Fax +39 051 260782
E-mail  monica.palmirani@unibo.it
====================================