Re: [legalruleml] LegalRuleML Tutorial slides for RuleML2014

I finally figured out what is confusing me in this example - it is the appearance of [Violation] instead of [Reparation].

On slide 23, Shouldn't it be

rep1: [Reparation] ps1, pen1

rep2: [Reparation] ps1, pen2

Similarly on slide 26

It is interesting how the alternatives for penalty propagates into (implicit?) alternatives for the reparation - we should mention that somehow.

Tara

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:03 AM, monica.palmirani <monica.palmirani@unibo.it> wrote:

Dear LegalRuleML members,

please find in attachment the slides for the LegalRuleML tutorial in RuleML2014 Symposium.

Best regards,
Monica Palmirani

--
===================================
Associate professor of Legal Informatics
School of Law
Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna
C.I.R.S.F.I.D. http://www.cirsfid.unibo.it/
Palazzo Dal Monte Gaudenzi - Via Galliera, 3
I - 40121 BOLOGNA (ITALY)
Tel +39 051 277217
Fax +39 051 260782
E-mail monica.palmirani@unibo.it
====================================

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

legalruleml message