Re: [legalruleml] Revised Section 5

[monica.palmirani <monica.palmirani@unibo.it>]

Il 02/11/2015 21:53, Tara Athan ha scritto:
> On 11/2/15 2:24 PM, monica.palmirani wrote:
> > Il 02/11/2015 20:14, Tara Athan ha scritto:
> > > On 11/2/15 2:00 PM, monica.palmirani wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > the LegalRuleML TC meeting will be postponed to tomorrow due to the 
> > > > fact that Guido is travelling today.
> > > > Thanks to Tara for the work. I will integrate it in the working draft.
> > > > However I would be happy to see an example of validation.
> > > I don't understand. What do you mean by "see an example of validation"?
> > ** Take a lrml file from the repository and make all the steps for 
> > checking the compliance according with the LegalRuleML conformance 
> > rules.
> > To see what it means, in practice, to check if a lrml file is a 
> > LegalRuleML XML or it isn't.
> Do you mean you want to see this, personally, or you want to put it in 
> the standard?
** it is nice to see during the next LegalRuleML TC meeting how to 
correctly check an lrml file (practically) and in case to explain it in 
plain text into the documentation.