I attach a new file because the
previous one seems generating some errors.
Yours,
Monica
Il 21/03/2017 07:15, monica.palmirani ha scritto:
Dear LegalRuleML members,
here after you can find the comments [1] provided by OASIS
Technical Advisory Board (TAB)[2], in the person of Patrick
Durusau[3].
The TAB is composed by elected OASIS members that provide
technical assessment to the TCs outcome, especially in the first
public review, in order improve the quality of the future specs.
I have analysed each comment in the light of the OASIS rules (what
is strictly mandatory by the OASIS process) and what is desirable
(what is recommended).
I have also analysed some examples of other OASIS specs (e.g.,
TOSCA, ODATA) in order to see how the others have faced similar
problems (precedents).
Additionally I have taken some advices also from the OASIS Staff.
The outcome of my work is in the second file
(LegalRuleML-14March2017v2-mp.xls) that has an additional column
with my annotation.
Friday 24 March we will have the next LegalRuleML TC and we will
discuss the possible solutions.
I hope that this work helps to have a productive discussion.
All the best,
Monica
ps. the comments list is public available here: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/legalruleml-comment/
For receiving automatically the comments posted in the legalruleml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
you should subscribe such list using this service [4].
[1]
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/legalruleml-comment/201703/msg00000.html
[2] https://www.oasis-open.org/tab
[3] http://www.durusau.net
[4] https://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
-------- Messaggio Inoltrato --------
Greetings!
The OASIS Technical Advisory Board (TAB) on initial public review drafts
by OASIS TCs.
On behalf of the TAB I have attached our comments on LegalRuleML Core
Specification Version 1.0 as LegalRuleML-14March2017.xls.
It isn't necessary to acknowledge each comment separately, just
acknowledging the file will be sufficient.
Hope you are having a great week!
Patrick
PS: I'm hopeful the TC can influence those involved in Deliberation
RuleML, Reaction RuleML and Consumer RuleML to move their work to
OASIS. While I respect the enormous amount of work put into those
"specifications," they are by no means "specifications" in the sense
that any standards driven vendor would recognize. While RuleML.org could
replicate the processes and procedures that exist at OASIS, I suppose
the question is whether they want to duplicate that overhead or devote
their efforts to improving and promoting the families of "RuleML."
That would not be an easy process, editorially or otherwise as the
documents I saw, from a standards perspective, have a number of
organizational and formal issues. But moving to OASIS would open up a
world of vendors who recognize standards when they see them.
Apologies for the brevity of my comments but as volunteers the TAB has
to work with the time alloted for reviews, which often results in formal
aspects getting more attention than substantive issues.
--
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau
--
===================================
Associate professor of Legal Informatics
School of Law
Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna
C.I.R.S.F.I.D. http://www.cirsfid.unibo.it/
Palazzo Dal Monte Gaudenzi - Via Galliera, 3
I - 40121 BOLOGNA (ITALY)
Tel +39 051 277217
Fax +39 051 260782
E-mail monica.palmirani@unibo.it
====================================
|