RE: [legalxml-comment] RE: LI related XML schema

[Scott Nieman <scott@ebMachines.com>]

Where ever this work resides, it is strongly recommended that the TC reuse
the OASIS /ebXML Registry to support these purposes.  The registry is
designed specifically to support "information asset" management (any "thing"
that goes through a life cycle) and collaborative workflow (although "flow"
is too linear of a concept).

Scott Nieman
Research Fellow
ebMachines

-----Original Message-----
From: John Messing [mailto:jmessing@law-on-line.com]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:55 AM
To: eddie@ringtailsolutions.com; 'Tony Rutkowski'
Cc: legalxml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [legalxml-comment] RE: LI related XML schema


The descriptions sounds like a standardized way of a doing a combination of
case management or document management workflow and signatures for specific
and related integrated justice applications that basically perform certain
common functions.

The eNotary TC deals with related issues and this might well be a subwork
group of that TC or of Integrated Justice. I am not sure. I would be happy
to discuss it further offlist in private emails if Mr. Rutkowski so desires.

Best regards.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddie O'Brien" <eddie@ringtailsolutions.com>
To: "'Tony Rutkowski'" <trutkowski@verisign.com>
Cc: <legalxml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:32 AM
Subject: [legalxml-comment] RE: LI related XML schema


> Hi Tony,
>
> Secure authenticated transactions are a different and very interesting
> area.
>
> John Messing has a new TC in establishment and is somewhat expert in
> this area.
>
> John and other may want to comment further.
>
> Regards
>
> Eddie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Rutkowski [mailto:trutkowski@verisign.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:32 AM
> To: eddie@ringtailsolutions.com
> Cc: legalxml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: LI related XML schema
>
> Hi Eddie,
>
> Since we're operating in exploratory mode, I am
> interested in schema associated with the Lawful
> Intercept process.  This would include:
>
> 1) input documents (e.g., probable cause requests
>     for court orders and subpoenas; court
>     orders and subpoenas),
> 2) administrative records (e.g., process and
>     intercept tracking, authentication, and
>     implementation),
> 3) output documents (e.g., compelled records,
>     signalling/content related data, and content)
>
> Should this be done in a separate group?  The
> participants involved here are likely rather
> specialized.
>
> thanks,
> tony
>
>
> Anthony M. Rutkowski
> Vice President
> NetDiscovery Strategy
> VeriSign, Inc
>   mailto:tony@verisign.com
>   mob: +1 703.887.5196
> Office:
>   21345 Ridgetop Circle
>   Dulles VA 20166-6503
>   USA
>   tel: +1 703.948.4305
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>