OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

legalxml-courtfiling-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Attorney Bar Number Identifier


In ECF 4.0, section 3.3.1.7 Filer and Party Identifiers, the very last sentence states: “The attorney elements for a self-represented litigant SHOULD NOT include a bar number.”

 

State Supreme Courts typically handle attorney discipline cases. Very often in these types of matters, the respondent attorney (i.e. the attorney up for discipline, such as disbarment) is Pro Se (i.e. self represented). So even though the attorney is the party in these types of matters, the court will want the attorney’s bar number included in the efiling communication.

 

How should this be done so as not to violate the constraint in section 3.3.1.7? Or is this constraint ill founded?

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]