Thanks Paul. We’ll get those fixed in our next Working Draft.
__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532
Very nice work on this specification!
While preparing the documents for publication, I noted a few items which the TC should consider fixing going forward.
- some elements linked under schema/niem have broken links because the actual directory tree has a different niem version number (4.0) than the text. (e.g., in Section 4.3, the link for "cyfs.xsd" is schema/niem/domains/cyfs/3.2/cyfs.xsd - should be schema/niem/domains/cyfs/4.0/cyfs.xsd)
most of these have hyperlinks which should be ../4.0/.. instead of ../3.2/..
- cbrn:MessageStatus (occurs 24 times)
- biom.xsd
- cyfs.xsd
- niem-core.xsd
- jxdm.xsd (this should be /6.0/ instead of /5.2/)
- the /schema and /example directories both include a file named "validate" which is a bash shell script file used in validating the files in that directory. It's not clear if these are intended as part of the ECF v5.0 work product.
- In the table in 6.5, the first column could be a bit wider to avoid some word wrapping.
- In Appendix B.2, the name of the ZIP file is given as "ecf-v5.0-spec-wd06.zip", which is incorrect - it will be "ecf-v5.0-csprd01.zip" for this specific publication. More generally, this could point to something like "the ZIP file accompanying this document
in the OASIS Library."
- in the table in E.1, the hyperlink for "caseresponse.xml" points to "examples" instead of expected "examples/caseresponse.xml" (same issue for "feesrequest.xml", possibly others)
Paul Knight - Tel: +1 781-883-1783
OASIS - Advancing open standards for the information society - Document Process Analyst