RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] CourtFiling Action Item - New Orleans

["Clarke, Tom" <Tom.Clarke@courts.wa.gov>]

Title: CourtFiling Action Item - New Orleans

I agree that it is great work.  Also, we could start on profiles after a little more work on the core specification.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Cabral, James E. [mailto:JCabral@mtgmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:44 AM
To: John Ruegg; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] CourtFiling Action Item - New Orleans

 

John Ruegg's Court Filing FAQ looks to me like a great start at defining the ebXML messaging profile for Court Filing Blue.  Thank you especially for providing the references to the relevant sections of the other specifications.  By leveraging these other specifications for common components like messaging and security, we can hopefully focus the work of the committee on the aspects specific to court filing. 

 

What's the next step here?  We will need a process to review and approve messaging and security profiles but we probably wait until we've defined the core specification in more detail.

Jim Cabral

 

 

---

From: John Ruegg [mailto:JRuegg@isab.co.la.ca.us]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 4:21 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] CourtFiling Action Item - New Orleans

Please find attached a document which maps Court Filing Blue discussion items to existing Open Standards.  This draft is for TC review and comment as input to Court Filing Blue standards for LegalXML Message Packaging, Message/Payload Authentication, Confidentiality and non-repudiation.

<<CFBlueRequirementsFAQ.doc>>