FW: [legalxml-courtfiling] Supplementary materials for Tuesday conferenc

I have included my comments for our meeting this afternoon.

I think we need to consider the effect on the timing of the release and it is impact on our ability to continue this effort. To that end, I would propose that we free up Eric, Shane and other members the requirements committee who will be the directly working on the specifications to begin their work on specifications and if we believe that the requirements are of sufficient completion that we create wordsmithing team.

Lets focus on closing the substantive issues today.

Regards,

Don

Donald L. Bergeron
Systems Designer
LexisNexis
donald.bergeron@lexisnexis.com
O 937-865-1276
H 937-748-2775
M 937-672-7781

From: John Greacen [mailto:john@greacen.net]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 11:57 PM
To: Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Supplementary materials for Tuesday conference call

We will add a third topic to the agenda for tomorrow's call, so that the agenda will now read:

1. Blue Requirements Document - Eric Tingom

2. Dr. Leff's suggestion to relocate the June face to face from Santa Fe (June 16-17) to Atlanta in conjunction with the June 8-10 GJXDM users conference

3. Solicitation of moderators for sections of the specification and schemas. Eric is currently anticipating that the remaining work for Court Filing Blue will fall into the following five areas:

a. Message Type

b. Business Rules applying to message types

c. Envelope XML Schema Issues

d. Content XML Schema Issues

e. Other XML Schema Issues (Security, Mime Types, Signatures)

We will need volunteers to serve as moderators for each of these five areas.

4. Other items of interest to the members

The list of comments on the requirements document is the attached Word document. We will use that document in our discussion. I have eliminated comments that identify typographical and grammatical errors and suggest word changes for clarity of meaning. Nonetheless, the list includes five general comments and fifty specific comments. I have corrected obvious typos in the comments, but I have not attempted otherwise to revise their wording; the language and meaning of several of them are far from clear to me.

I suggest that all participants in the call identify the comments with which they agree and disagree so that we can proceed through the list more quickly - for instance, by identifying comments with which no one disagrees which therefore need no discussion.

I look forward to the call tomorrow.

John M. Greacen

Greacen Associates, LLC

HCR 78, Box 23

Regina, New Mexico 87046

505-289-2164

505-289-2163 (fax)

505-780-1450 (cell)

legalxml-courtfiling message