OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item


Hi Dallas.

This diagram is intended to apply only to the Web Services Messaging Profile.  (It is intended to go into the strawman specification in the WS MP section.)  I would hope other profiles would provide a similar diagram or other description of how the parts of a complete message fit together for transmission between MDEs.

As the diagram doesn't get into the contents of the message body, it doesn't show where "embedded" documents would go.  But it certainly doesn't preclude them, should they be included in the message structure schema for a particular message.

Do we have a requirement in the requirements document for the "version controls" feature you mention below?  If it would be implemented in SOAP headers in the WS MP, I would think it would be a non-functional requirement.

> It is my understanding that we have agreed that the standard is not restricted to one specific Communication layer.
> With that in mind, we should take the SOAP Message Package out of the discussion. I also believe in previous
> discussions that we agreed to allow the documents to be embedded in the body or to be included as attachments such as
> that which is defined below. I would anticipate that there should be two diagrams depending on which one an
> implementation desires otherwise we are binding ourselves to require the SOAP messaging layer as identified in your
> diagram.
>
> Also, from my previous message I believe that the standard clearly needs to define version controls which I think
> should reside in the SOAP Header area. The standard also needs to define how that process works with intermediary
> nodes.
>
> Dallas
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John M. Greacen
> To: Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 4:46 PM
> Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item
>
>
> Please post your comments by nest Tuesday on the following architecture for the Court Filing Blue message structure
> proposed by Scott Came.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John M. Greacen
>
> Greacen Associates, LLC
>
> HCR 78 Box 23
>
> Regina, New Mexico 87046
>
> 505-289-2164
>
> 505-289-2163 (fax)
>
> 505-780-1450 (cell)
>
> john@greacen.net
>
>
>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]