Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] New Proposed Service Models for ECF3

["Dallas Powell" <dpowell@tybera.com>]

Title: Please review 'Proposed Service Models for ECF3'

Jim and everyone,

 

Here is a new document that I think incorporate Jim's changes and adds new issues that were also on the Thursday call but were too much information for the first document.  If this works, we can continue to expand.

 

 

Dallas

----- Original Message -----

From: Cabral, James E.

To: Dallas Powell ; Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee

Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:11 PM

Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] New Proposed Service Models for ECF3

Dallas,

 

Here is a revision that I think solves the issues you identified.  I think we still need the query in Model B so that eService A can decide to serve something that will not be part of the court record.  By separating out the MDE that responds to the query (I called it the "eService Registry") and the central MDE that serves the other participants, I think it aligns the two models. 

 

  jim

---

From: Dallas Powell [mailto:dpowell@tybera.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 5:28 PM
To: 'Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee'
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] New Proposed Service Models for ECF3

Here is what I think we said today regarding the eService.  As I wrote the document I found several issues that need to be addressed.

 

Dallas

Secondary Service V3.doc

eService Flow.vsd

Secondary Service V3.pdf