[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Additional Comments on Criteria RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Criteria for inclusion of elements in the ECF core specification
My comments are shown in blue on top of
Roger’s changes below. My concern about “court administration”
is its broad nature which we could fix by attaching definitions, but my
thinking is that is it meant for information specific to management or
processing of the case being filed. I substituted “case management”.
I also suggest removing the “common” and “uncommon”
terminology, simply allowing for specifying a particular case type or
particular case types. From: Winters,
Roger [mailto:Roger.Winters@METROKC.GOV] I have edited the paragraph (below, showing changes in red) in
hopes of increasing the clarity of the distinctions you are making. (I am,
after all, the TC’s Editor.) The result is below. If I have changed the
meaning, that would be because I did not understand the point being made. I
used underscoring to distinguish the three types of message being discussed (common,
case-specific, court-specific). I also thought it may be best to
get away from concepts like “majority” (= 50% + 1) where it seemed
you intended the “generality” of courts, etc. I hope these changes
are on track and help clarify matters. Roger Roger Winters Program and
Project Manager and Continuing
Legal Education (CLE) Coordinator Department of Judicial Administration 516 V: (206) 296-7838 F: (206)
296-0906 roger.winters@metrokc.gov From: Cabral,
James E. [mailto:JCabral@mtgmc.com] ECF TC: One of my tasks was to define some criteria for the
inclusion of elements in ECF. Please review and comment on the following
draft language for insertion into the next version of the specification: Elements in the ECF core specification, whether in common, case type-specific, or court-specific messages, should be generally useful to a case management system for
purposes of filing review, docketing and/or elements in the core-specification should be useful as “filing
metadata” about the case, the filing transaction,
parties or documents. sheet can generally be considered document(s) being filed. Elements
in the ECF common
messages should be applicable to
case-types[Bousquin, Terrie] . to a the Jim Cabral James E. Cabral Jr. The information transmitted is intended only for
the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]