RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Re-revised proposed TC charter

["O'Brien, Robert" <Robert.OBrien@cas-satj.gc.ca>]

I would second that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Winters, Roger [mailto:Roger.Winters@kingcounty.gov] 
Sent: December 12, 2007 10:58 AM
To: John Greacen
Cc: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Re-revised proposed TC charter

John,

 

The revisions all look fine to me, both as a member of the TC and as
Editor. One question I have relates to a line that was already in the
draft:

 

5.	sending and receiving payments associated with filings
electronically, 

The way this is written, I am led to wonder whether the word "filings"
should be rendered as "filing" here. That would be correct if it refers
to the activity of "filing electronically." 

 

However, if the word "filings" relates to the payments, as in "payments
associated with filings," then the word "electronically" needs to be at
the beginning of this item. The result would be:

 

5. electronically sending and receiving payments associated with
filings,

 

If the latter is the intended sense for this item, I hope you can shift
the position of this word in the draft as a simple editorial correction,
placing the adverb "electronically" in a different place for clarity's
sake.

 

Regards,

 

Roger

 

Roger Winters

Program and Project Manager

King County Department of Judicial Administration

KCC-JA-0609

516 Third Avenue, E-609 

Seattle, WA 98104

(206) 296-7838

roger.winters@kingcounty.gov <mailto:roger.winters@kingcounty.gov>  <
NEW

________________________________

From: John Greacen [mailto:greacenjmg@earthlink.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:59 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Re-revised proposed TC charter

 

In Las Vegas, the members present made a number of additional changes
and updates to the TC's charter.  

 

I attach our most recent effort.  You can identify the modifications
made in Las Vegas by the color of the new date near the top of the
document.  We made several changes to the scope of the TC's efforts and
to its proposed future deliverables and their deadlines - to keep faith
with the roadmap that we approved a month ago apprising our constituents
that we do not plan major further releases for at least a year and a
half after the release of ECF 4.0 this spring.

 

Please submit any objections or additions you want the TC to consider by
the close of business on December 17th.

 

If there are no further changes, I will submit the proposed document to
OASIS staff, who in turn will post it for a formal vote by TC members.