[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] RE: [faked-from] [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - ECF TC Agenda 041216.docx uploaded
|
Greg,
Philip and Eric tested your WSDLs and both found they were a improvement over previous WSDLs. There is a clear consensus that this is the approach we want to use for ECF 5. We also had a significant conversation about whether we can implement the approach for ECF 4. We discussed 3 options:
1. Update current ECF 4 web services SIP 2.1 · Risks: Violates our approach of no major changes in a minor release. Obsoletes existing implementation and certifications 2. Put out a new version of ECF 4 web services SIP major version (3.0?) · Risk: Multiple versions may confuse users and implementers 3. Wait for ECF 5 web services SIP (5.0?) · Risk: When will ECF 5 be ready?
We deferred a decision on this until the May meeting to give everyone time to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Hopefully
__
From: Greg Zarkis
Good Morning All-
I just wanted to let you know that unfortunately I will not be able to attend the call today due to a scheduling conflict. If there are any question or concerns regarding the proposed WSDL, please feel free to contact me direct to discuss. Any and all feedback is welcome!
Thanks! -Greg
From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of James Cabral
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]