Philip,
I updated the minutes with #2.
Re: #1, that s an interesting idea and something that could be accomplished, as you said, with ECF 4.01.
__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532
From: Baughman, Philip
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 7:03 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Court Policy MDE
In reviewing my notes from the face-to-face meeting, I have two follow-up points:
1.
ECF5 – a new Court Policy MDE
a.
Since ECF only stipulates the MDEs/operations and does not identify the particular systems that implement them, what, if anything, would prevent a multi-EFP implementation via ECF 4 today? Meaning:
i. State stands up a system to provide GetPolicy
ii. State system proxies the incoming requests to the backing systems (EFM, CMS, whatever systems are implementing the rest of the FRMDE), augmenting with state level policy as needed
2.
Regardless of the outcome on #1, I appear to have left off one item from the minutes:
a.
ECF would need to specific a mechanism to obtain a list of the court locations (so that you could then invoke GetPolicy for a given court location)
“See” you all next year! Be safe!
Philip Baughman
Senior Software Engineering Manager, eSolutions
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
P: 972.713.3770 ext: 113406
www.tylertech.com
