RE: 0065 - ECF 5.0 - Better support for confidentiality/security

["Baughman, Philip" <Philip.Baughman@tylertech.com>]

That is actually not my list - I took it directly from action item 65 within the TC's site.  I believe those discussions pre-date my involvement with the TC.

But my 2 cents - yes, private = secure within the context.


Philip Baughman
Senior Software Engineering  Manager, eSolutions
P: 972.713.3770 ext: 113406

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert DeFilippis [mailto:rtd@onelegal.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 8:25 PM
To: Baughman, Philip <Philip.Baughman@tylertech.com>; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: 0065 - ECF 5.0 - Better support for confidentiality/security 

Hi Philip, 

Regarding the 4 Background scenarios you list, the last one:

* A public case whereby certain parties' attachment to the case is private

You use the word 'private'.  Is this the same as 'secure' or 'secured'?


-Robert



-----Original Message-----
From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Baughman, Philip
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 3:07 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] 0065 - ECF 5.0 - Better support for confidentiality/security 

See attached for my proposal in regards to the codes for ECF 5 confidentiality/security.

 

 

 

Philip Baughman
Senior Software Engineering Manager, eSolutions Tyler Technologies, Inc. 

P: 972.713.3770 ext: 113406 

www.tylertech.com <http://www.tylertech.com/> 

  

 <http://www.tylertech.com/?utm_campaign=email-sig-tylertech&utm_medium=email-signature&utm_source=corp&utm_content=web-link>