[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: ECF 5: FIPS Country Code Alternatives?
Jim, NIEM supports a number of possible representations for countries, including FIPS 10-4 and 3 different ISO code lists. Currently, ECF 4 and the draft of ECF 5 both include nc:LocationCountryName and nc:LocationCountryFIPS10-4Code. We could decide to switch from FIPS to one of the ISO codes. If we support multiple codes, we need to consider the added complexity for implementers. type: (nc:CountryType) Add Add
All Add nc:CountryAugmentationPoint abstract details Add nc:CountryRepresentation abstract details substitutable
by: Add nc:LocationCountryName ( nc : ProperNameTextType ) details Add nc:CountryCode ( nc : CodeType ) details __ From: Price, Jim TC, We’ve run into an interesting situation with the nc:LocationCountryFIPS10-4Code code values. It turns out that one of our CMS’s country codes are based on ISO, not FIPS. For ECF 5, should the country code be standards body agnostic and
instead rely on Court Policy to make the country code determination. Background: Arizona is a non-unified court system that operates several different CMSs. Thanks for your consideration, Jim |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]