RE: ECF 5: CaseGeneralCategoryText, CaseCategoryText, and CaseSubCatego

Jim,

I believe the CaseCategoryCode.gc will work for Arizona, but before committing to a definitive answer, I have a couple of questions that require clarification. Perhaps a gc primer is in order…

Each of the “attributes” (or elements) associated with CaseCategoryCode (i.e., CaseType, CaseCategory, CaseSubCategory, and CaseSubType) appear to indicate they are required (Use=”required”). In reality, not all of these “attribute values” are required. Does “Use=required” mean that “attribute” or element values that have no value to communicate must be present but empty in XML messages?
From a Court Policy perspective, must each CaseCategoryCode “attribute” or element value be pre-defined? In other words, based on the table below, if a message contains ‘Non-IV-D’ in the element representing CaseCategoryCode, does this mean that we would know, without having any of the other “attribute” or element values contained in the table, that CaseType is ‘FamilyLaw’, CaseCategory is ‘Domestic Relations’, CaseSubCategory is ‘Dissolution with Children’, and CaseSubtype is ‘Non-IV-D’?

CaseCategoryCode	Definition	CaseType	CaseCategory	CaseSubCategory	CaseSubtype
Civil Penalty	Civil Penalty	Civil Penalty	Civil Penalty	Contract, Civil Penalty
Non-IV-D	Non-IV-D for both Dissolution and Paternity	FamilyLaw	Domestic Relations	Dissolution with Children	Non-IV-D
Open Stated	Probate	Will	Will	Open Stated	Non-IV-D
Mental Health Adult	Probate	Probate	Mental Health	Mental Health Adult

Thanks,

Jim

From: James E Cabral [mailto:jec@mtgmc.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2018 9:19 AM
To: Price, Jim <JPrice@courts.az.gov>; legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: ECF 5: CaseGeneralCategoryText, CaseCategoryText, and CaseSubCategoryText

Jim,

Here is my attempt to map the Rosetta stone to a version of CaseCategoryCode.gc for Arizona. Does this help?

__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532

From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Price, Jim <JPrice@courts.az.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 12:28:28 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] ECF 5: CaseGeneralCategoryText, CaseCategoryText, and CaseSubCategoryText

Jim Cabral,

Per today’s TC conference call, please find the attached “ECF TC - Arizona CRMDE Rosetta Stone” document. The Rosetta Stone is used in Arizona to correlate CaseGeneralCategoryText, CaseCategoryText, and CaseSubCategoryText values across disparate CRMDEs (a Federated model approach). Note that the highlighted text refers to the values used to set Court Policy for each of the identified CRMDEs. Please note that there are other CRMDEs not yet accounted for in the attached Rosetta Stone document.

Regards,

Jim Price

legalxml-courtfiling message