RE: RequestCourtDateResponseMessageType

Enrique,

You’re right. It is based on ecf:CaseFilingType but should be based on ecf:ResponseMessage Type. I’ll update it and republish WD37.

__
Jim Cabral
502 509-4532

From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Othon, Enrique <Enrique.Othon@tylertech.com>
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 12:25:43 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] RequestCourtDateResponseMessageType

I noticed this response message does not have a cbrn:MessageStatus in it. Should it not?

From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of James Cabral
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 5:04 PM
To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Groups - ECF TC Agenda 100918.docx uploaded

Submitter's message
I updated WD37 to include some modifications to Gary's example instances for the appellate use cases. This revised agenda includes the updated links to WD37.
-- Mr. James Cabral

Document Name: ECF TC Agenda 100918.docx

Description
At this meeting, we will vote whether to approve ECF 5.0 WD37 as a
Committee Specification Draft and Public Review Draft.
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link

Submitter: Mr. James Cabral
Group: OASIS LegalXML Electronic Court Filing TC
Folder: Meeting Minutes
Date submitted: 2018-10-04 15:03:37
Revision: 2

legalxml-courtfiling message