[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
Jason, I don't want to create false expectations -- I am not doing the Mozilla or any other cross-browser representations, believing that the purpose of this exercise is to show that standard W3C CSS, Level 2, is adequate to the task. Insofar as "hanging indents", now I understand what you are saying ... yes, it's easy to do with CSS - simply add "text-indent: -1.45em;" to the ListItem selector. There is a better, more sure, way of doing it that mimics what I can do with my markup for article, section, clause, and subclauses, because each article, section, clause, and subclause is composed of a BlockCaption and a BlockBody -- in these cases, all one needs to do is set both as inline objects, with the height on BlockCaption set to 100%. I have tried this internally and it looks just fine. Have to set the width of the two blocks, though. A similar thing can be done with Lists but, since this was my first crack at lists, I hadn't addressed that. Now that I think about it, the preferred way to go with lists is to assume that a <List> is for an inline list, and a <BlockList> is for a block list of the sort seen in the Benchmark document. But the point is that it's technically feasible using CSS, without much violence to the XML at all. John McClure
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]