RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Signature Areas

["John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>]

Hey Jason,
I thought youmight get a grin out of that... The answer has to be yes, the
author would need to create a <section> for that content. I owuld agree that
it's likely not a usual practice, but in order to be labelled "G", then yes it
must be a <section> as part of the doc outline. Note that doing so, the user
expects that the Signatures block would be listed in any generated table of
contents (navigation list) for the document, something that wouldn't be done if
the content was not located in a <section>.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jason Harrop [mailto:jharrop@speedlegal.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:52 PM
>To: 'Legalxml-Econtracts'
>Subject: Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Signature Areas
>
>
>Hi John
>
>Nice to see an example document :)
>
>Presumably you/Peter would encapsulate the signature blocks within item
>G, since it appears to be the authors intent that conceptually, they
>form part of the grammatical para in item G?
>
>thanks
>
>Jason
>
>
>
>
>John McClure wrote:
>> Here is a simple 3 page lease that captions the signature area of a contract
>> consistent with the numbering of its preceding clauses. This is not a common
>> practice, but I wanted to share that it does occur. My proposal to
>identify just
>> the specific signature text using an inline element, would not lead to the
>> concerns that arise from trying to markup a signature area when it
>occurs within
>> a clause.
>>
>> http://www.aa.psu.edu/stulife/housing/sample_lease.pdf
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
>roster of the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-econtracts/members/leave_w
orkgroup.php.
>
>
>


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-econtracts/members/leave_w
orkgroup.php.