[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes Draft from the OASIS Legal XML Member Section Electronic Contracts Technical Committee Secretary (File id: @@2618)
Minutes Meeting of November Tenth 2005 The OASIS legal XML member Section e-Contracts Technical Commmittee Present: Rolly Chambers, Dan Greenwood, Peter Meyer, Laurence Leff, Dave Marvit Our meeting was primarily based upon "Development steps for TC Specification Revised" which you can find annotated at at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-econtracts/email/archives/200511/msg00000.html Meeting Started at 18:03 Eastern Time In 1.1.2, we decided that we are focussing on providing an XML as a backend to such products as OpenOffice.org and Microsoft.xml. And our standard should be convertable to either of these as needed, while remaining independent of both of these standards and how the market may view or use them in the future. We are also independent of changes to these standards and note both of them are considerably more complicated than OpenML. One of the members reported on a related discussion with the CIO of one of top three law firms in Australia. We also noted the issues in users of OpenOffice products of Microsoft Word in using styles consistently so as to facilitate this transformation. Our committee decided to keep our specification within contracts, although we may have pointers to web sites to address other issues and we may mention our belief that firms would prefer to use the same standard for other purposes such as correspondence or litigation documents. We decided to use Relax as the schema in our specification, at least for initial drafts although we hope to include a version in XML Schema in the specification. We may possibly include one in DTD. Mr. Meyer will ensure that we can validate the Schema and Relax NG and that any example documents validate with any specification included in the specification. Mr. Dan Greenwood volunteered to match the above-mentioned document against the minutes to show the resolution of each point. We set an action item to address the issue of URI's versus URL's, URN's and name space identifiers. There was a discussion of including vocabularies and how our specification relates to UBL. The fact that the BNML specification incorporates the Dublin core was mentioned favorably. We discussed the XML markup for Party and Addresses. We regret that there are several standards that use different ways of marking up such ubiquitious information as people and addresses. UBL has markup for this purpose; vCard does as well. (We briefly discussed whether vCard was an XML standard or was just an ASCII format.) We hope to revisit this issue and find a good source for this markup that has "general use" and noted the comments of a CO that it would be desirable to "coattail" on the "big kid on the block." We also discussed customization of the schema (1.6), noting that the Elkera specification provided for customization as in contrast to just being a specific schema for contracts. We decided that our specification should have a working example and base implementation recognizing that many users would wish to customize it for their own purposes. There was a brief discussion of how would complete the specification quickly and whether we could complete it by the end of the calendar year. The TC decided that the next meetings would be November 22nd and December Eigth. These would be at our regular time of 18:00. (Note November 22nd is not a Thursday to accomodate the United States Thanksgiving holiday.) Meeting adjourned at 19:04 Eastern.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]