RE: [legalxml-enotary] Proposal for agenda of next meeting of the TC

[Pieter Kasselman <pkasselman@baltimore.com>]

Hi Charles, the idea is to provide a framework within which such a consumer
report can be compiled. As a simplistic example, a CA gets a certain number
of points for following certain procedures when issuing a credential. These
points are totalled, and the higher the points, the more trustworthy the
credential.

I am of the opinion that this TC should not publish any "consumer reports"
or "editor's choices".

Cheers

Pieter

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Gilliam, Charles [SMTP:Charles.Gilliam@CONTENTGUARD.COM]
> Sent:	27 December 2002 09:20
> To:	jmessing@law-on-line.com; legalxml-enotary@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject:	RE: [legalxml-enotary] Proposal for agenda of next meeting
> of the	TC
> 
> Testing understanding -- 
>         Is the proposal for the TC to act similar to "Consumers Reports"
> and test known solutions, designate "Editors Choices" and provide test
> results? Any third parties would then be free to use the results and
> opinions to help decide what solution is best for it.
> 
>  --Charles 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: John Messing [ <mailto:jmessing@law-on-line.com>] 
> Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 09:48 AM 
> To: legalxml-enotary@lists.oasis-open.org 
> Subject: [legalxml-enotary] Proposal for agenda of next meeting of the 
> TC 
> 
> 
> Pieter Kasselman, pkasselman@baltimore.com, wrote on 20 Dec 2002 at
> 16:08:19 -0000, after a series of emails with me acting in my capacity as
> Chair:
> 
> "It is proposed that the e-Notary TC identify various registration
> procedures and technical aspects within registration procedures. In
> addition the e-Notary TC can provide a rating system for the technical
> aspects and procedures. This rating system will allow a weight to be
> attached to a digital credential and allows a verifier to make a judgement
> on the quality of the digital credential. In addition a method for
> annotating this weighting to a document witnessed or signed with a given
> credential may be established."
> 
> I intend to make this the sole agenda item of our next meeting and put the
> question to a decision of the voting members of the TC present at the
> meeting whether to make this our immediate goal in terms of a first step
> in the realization of the Charter.
> 
> It might be useful to have some discussion before the meeting on the list
> to clarify the nature of the proposal and any issues that should be
> resolved. Please feel free to start one or more conversation threads.
> 
> The meeting will be held during the time period January 15-31, 2002.
> Certain members have already communicated to me their own preferences for
> a date and time. This TC is still small enough where I will try to take
> individual scheduling issues of all attendees into consideration in fixing
> a meeting date and time. I will not fix the meeting date and time until
> each of you has had an opportunity to communicate a preference for certain
> dates and times over others and an intention to participate in the
> meeting.. While I cannot guarantee to resolve all conflicts in schedules,
> I will make a good faith effort to do so.
> 
> Please RSVP with your preferences by December 29, 2002, after which I will
> set the meeting date and time without further delay.
> 
> Thank you. 
> 
> May all of you spend a happy and safe holiday season. 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> John Messing 
> 3900 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite 201 
> Tucson, AZ 85711 
> (520)547-7933 (v) 
> (520)547-7920 (f) 
> jmessing@law-on-line.com 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription 
> manager: < <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>> 
> 
> 
> 
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended
for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or
there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The 
unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is 
strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for
direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration
of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any 
virus being passed on.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for Content
Security threats, including computer viruses.
http://www.baltimore.com