RE: Signature profiles

[John Messing <jmessing@law-on-line.com>]

The Electronic Court Filing TC adopted two other signature profiles in
the meantime that are waiting action by OASIS staff to be added to the
website for a total of five, giving great flexibility and rich context
in the types of available profiles. Best regards.


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Signature profiles
> From: John L Jones <jjones@arionzoe.com>
> Date: Mon, March 06, 2006 1:31 pm
> To: John Messing <jmessing@law-on-line.com>
> Cc: legalxml-enotary@lists.oasis-open.org,  carmen@cdbconsultancy.com, 
> HGardner@mortgagebankers.org,  gabe_minton@mbaa.org, 
> mark.ladd@addison-one.com
> 
>       Mark Ladd can address this more fully, but I think we can do that.
> MISMO's architecture group reviewed the PRIA signature element,
> recognized it as primitive form that needs to be addressed in the
> architecture. I forwarded the 3 signature profiles I found in eCourt
> Filing and the head of the MISMO architecture was going to adopt them to
> fit the current architecture of MISMO. The group generally agreed
> cross-organizational standardization is a good thing, so I think we can
> move in the same direction. Until MISMO moves to a 3.0 specification we
> can't use name spaces, but otherwise we can adopt the schema
> architecture.
>  
>  John Messing wrote:  May I suggest that the TC consider using the
> signature profiles of
>  CourtFiling 3.x as a partial basis for starting its work.
>  
>