[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-ms] Recruitment of consultant(s) to draft specifications
John,
In
issuing this recruitment I think you may have at least indirectly addressed some
of the concerns listed in my posting of August 10th (included below):
"Technical Writer" is now "Consultant," and any time frames for deliverables
have been deleted. Since I (and the TC, for that matter) don't have the benefit
of a formal response to my concerns, I don't know whether to think of these
changes as "fixes" or "patches."
For
the record, I remain particularly concerned about the consequences of incomplete
requirements (item 3 in my posting), and the implied commitments regarding TC
activities or deliverables (item 2) in light of past performance. I don't know
if other members of the TC share these concerns, but as this course is being
taken in the name of the Member Section and thus the TC, I believe it's
incumbent upon the co-chairs to address them. Also, I would very much appreciate
knowing what the candidate selection criteria will be.
Mind you, I am not arguing that obtaining
outside or paid help is something the TC shouldn't do, only that we should
make every effort to do it right. It may be our last shot.
TJS
Tom
Smith
AVI/ITDecision
650.591.1795 (Ofc)
650.346.7689 (Mobile)
650.591.1425
(Fax) -----Original Message-----
From: T J Smith [mailto:TJSmith@itdecision.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 10:56 AM To: John Greacen; Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Attached technical writer statement of work As I
mentioned during today's call, I have the following problems with the Technical
Writer Statement of Work.
TJS
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]