[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: First document model comment
Dear All
I was wondering whether the current draft could be improved by splitting
out orthogonal concerns into separate schemas, reusing existing schemas where
possible:
a) the structure of a printed transcript i.e. day, page, line, timestamp
(i.e.what you describe as the “physical model”)
b) structure of a court document – title sheet with parties etc. (already
in legalxml?)
c) the structure of dialog between multiple named persons of various types
see
http://reference.kfupm.edu.sa/content/t/o/towards_a_minimal_standard_for_dialogue__126547.pdf
d) specialisation of c) to types of persons in court – judge, witness,
counsel etc.
e) specialisation of c) for court dialog types: question answer speech
comment etc.
A full transcript might be a composition of
these various namespaces. I am reading and writing a), but want to defer the
requirement for tools to read and write b) to e).
Robert
Onslow
X Legal Ltd.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]