Re: [lexidma] Report on subsensing in dictionaries

[Michal MÄchura <Michal.Boleslav.Mechura@ijs.si>]

No I didn't. The last example is a non-example, so my lazy self concluded that it doesn't need any figures or code listings.
M.

On 14/10/2020 09:39, Iztok wrote:

Hi Michal,

Have you perhaps forgotten to attach the Figures to the last example from the Irish dictionary? There is just an empty page after the text.

Best

Iztok


-----Original Message-----
From: lexidma@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:lexidma@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Michal MÄchura
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 9:04 AM
To: lexidma@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [lexidma] Report on subsensing in dictionaries

Hi all,

As promised, here is my report on subsensing (= sense-inside-sense embedding) in dictionaries. It analyses how subsensing tends to be used in modern born-digital dictionaries, and makes a proposal for modelling it in our own standard.

This is an exciting topic, I enjoyed spending brain-time on it, and I hope my report will move us closer towards a consensus. I'm looking forward to your comments.

Michal




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php