Re: [lexidma] Working draft

[John McCrae <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>]

Hi Michal,

Some general comments about the draft as it is.

• We have no way to represent fine-grained morphosyntactic information, including gender of nouns and categories of inflections. For example the annotation on this entry and its inflected form 'boise'
  
• We cannot give citations for sources of information, as is typical in historical dictionaries (see image)
  
• There is no etymology information (as discussed in the call). See example in Merriam-Webster:
  
• I am not sure how we intend to implement collocations (see example in FoclÃir Gaeilge-BÃarla)
• No modelling for hypernym relations

Should I add in this modelling and make a PR to your branch?

Regards,

John

On 22/09/2021 16:10, Michal MÄchura wrote:

Hi all,

I have made a few changes to the pull request:
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/lexidma/pull/4

A PDF version of the working draft, which contains those changes, is attached. Read sections 3 to 8 if you want to skip over the boilerplate and read only what I have written.

Also, I have written a summary of the principles that guided me while I was writing the working draft:
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/lexidma/wiki/Document-design-principles
These are not principles we have agreed, so they are open for discussion.

I hope this is moving us forward and I hope to meet you all soon.
M.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php