[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Groups - Action Item "Provider criteria and qualifications for service" Modified
Action Item Subject: Provider criteria and qualifications for service Item Number: #0005 Description Need to consider models for capturing screening criteria and qualifications for provider services. Owner: John Greacen Status: Closed Priority: Medium Due Date: 01 Jun 2019 Comments Mr. Jim Harris 2019-01-02 22:30 UTC John Greacen will re-engage original task team to address this issue, including Riyaz Samnani, Lester Bird, Glenn Rawdon, Joyce Raby and Suzanne Brown-McBride. Mr. Jim Harris 2019-02-05 19:56 UTC Changing the due date for the next TC call. John - Feel free to revise due date as you deem appropriate. Mr. Jim Harris 2019-03-04 23:07 UTC John has added Abhijeet Chavan to the task team and reiterated the goal of finding a way to capture all eligibility criteria that a service provider has so that we can insure that the referrals each provider gets are the ones it wants ? for the benefit of the user and of the provider. Mr. Jim Harris 2019-03-05 19:17 UTC Discussion in LP TC call: Some suggest there is no end to the number of criteria that individual programs will have. Assume we don't know what the criteria will be. Dynamic/configurable eligibility criteria. Possible solution - 1) what is the question, 2) what are available answers, 3) what answers qualify for eligibility. Could also standardize common types of criteria. Limitation: Legal Aid desire to identify "impact case"? John will setup task team meeting to review in detail. Mr. Jim Harris 2019-04-02 17:21 UTC John G reported via email that the task team has come to consensus on a recommended approach for the initial version of LPX. The attached Word document "Provider Criteria and Qualifications for Service 3-26-19" describes the approach. Mr. Jim Harris 2019-05-14 17:59 UTC Barb will include elements from described approach in models/messages for June 1 draft. Questions re. complexity of algorithms and whether LPX should try to implement them. Simple criteria could be addressed, but more complex criteria should go back to provider. Would assume real-time process in the latter (for pre-referral purposes). Mr. Jim Harris 2019-07-02 19:44 UTC Reviewed updates to models in latest working draft during June 18 and July 2 TC calls and confirmed they reflect intentions developed here. This action item is now considered complete/closed. Referenced Items
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]