[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: agreement comments
Scott McGrath & Co: Although various political appeals for “tort reform”
do not typically extend to IT IP, it probably should. As a former individual
member, I’ll comment primarily in that context. There are two reasons for someone to be an “individual”
member. One is that the person truly is on his/her own, and of course such a
person has no IP entanglements at all. Presumably the proposed agreement is OK
for that person, but there can’t be many such people. The other reason for an “individual” membership is
that the person is part of some larger entity, but the larger entity is not
sufficiently motivated to join as a corporate member. In particular, a large
corporation is unlikely to join just to support a lone contributor because of
the membership fees. Until recently, I was an individual member, while an employee
of BOC Group. As usual for IT people, with BOC I had signed invention
agreements, etc. so there were some IP entanglements. As a remote possibility,
in the course of discussing OASIS matters with OASIS members, I might have somehow
“invented” something that was subsequently embedded in an OASIS
offering, and to which BOC could assert some IP claim based on my employment. Given
that OASIS is about standards, the likelihood of such a thing happening was
low, and even more so because BOC is much more of an “end user” IT
consuming company than an IT provider. If you tighten up the IP aspects of the agreement, you may
make it impossible for there to be “individual” members from the “working
class.” The prospective member can’t individually sign that he/she
has no IP entanglements, nor typically can he/she sign regarding the behavior
of the employer. One alternative would be to alter the corporate membership
fees/terms to remove the economic hindrance to single-employee membership and,
in effect, to create a “silent” IP-centered corporate membership.
As an example, it cost BOC $500 per year for me to be an individual member.
When I left BOC, I formed my own consultancy - Colts Neck Solutions LLC –
and to sign up Colts Neck Solutions LLC cost $2,750 per year and, for most
purposes, I am still a “solo” member. A large company would of
course pay much more. The “real” corporate member gets more “visibility,”
but some companies won’t value that visibility and in fact might not even
want it. Therefore, if you created an “individual”
membership specifically designed for singleton corporate employee memberships, that
membership could perhaps still cost $500, but require some corporate
representative to sign the IP agreement. In effect the person’s employer
is joining for IP purposes, but is not listed as a corporate member.
Colts Neck Solutions LLC
732-332-1885 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]